| 2018 | Judicial review | High Court | Emmanuel Ankamah | ACS Africa Coastal Services Ltd v CG | Whether, on a proper interpretation of Act 862 (as amended), the plaintiff is subject to the NFSL | Unanswered | Act 862 | ACS Africa Coastal Services (GH) Ltd v Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court) | |
| 2018 | Judicial review | High Court | Emmanuel Ankamah | ACS Africa Coastal Services Ltd v CG | Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to hear the case instituted as a writ instead of an appeal | No | s44 of A915, Order 2R2 of CI 47 | ACS Africa Coastal Services (GH) Ltd v Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court) | |
| 2021 | Judicial review | High Court | Sheila Minta | African Mining Services (Ghana) Pty Ltd v CG | Whether it was lawful for the taxpayer to split an assessment into interpretation issues and computational issues and apply for waiver of the 30% requirement on the computational issues | No | s42(5-6) of A915 | African Mining Services (Ghana) Pty Ltd v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2018 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Samuel Asiedu | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v CG | Whether payments made under an unregistered technology transfer agreement are tax deductible | No | Act 865: ss 32(c), 37, 41(2)(c), 43, Act 896: ss 9(1), 116–117 | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2018 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Samuel Asiedu | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v CG | Whether reimbursements to distributors for 3rd party costs iro putting up stands should attract withholding taxes | Yes | Act 896): ss 9(1), 116–117 | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2018 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Samuel Asiedu | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v CG | Whether reimbursements to distributors iro discounts to distributors’ customers can be reclassified as commission to sales agent | Yes | | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2018 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Samuel Asiedu | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v CG | Whether the 1/4 payment requirement in CI47 must be met in addition t the 30% requirement under A915 | Yes | Order 54 r 4(1)–(2) | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2019 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Dennis Adjei, Henry Kwofie, Alex Poku-Acheampong | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v CG | Whether the 1/4 payment requirement in CI47 must be met in addition t the 30% requirement under A915 | No | | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2019 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Dennis Adjei, Henry Kwofie, Alex Poku-Acheampong | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v CG | Whether payments made under an unregistered technology transfer agreement are tax deductible | Yes | | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2020 | Judicial review | High Court | Doreen G. Boakye-Agyei | Bishop Daniel Obinim vs GRA & Ecobank Ghana Ltd | Whether a taxpayer’s response to a demand notice 6 months after being served with a notice of assessment constitutes an objection | No | Act 915, Orders 54 & 55 of CI 47 | Bishop Daniel Obinim v. Commissioner-General, Ghana Revenue Authority; Ecobank Ghana Ltd (High Court) | |
| 2020 | Judicial review | High Court | Doreen G. Boakye-Agyei | Bishop Daniel Obinim vs GRA & Ecobank Ghana Ltd | Whether there was a breach of natural justice when the GRA did not respond to the taxpayer’s response to the demand notice | No | Act 915, Orders 54 & 55 of CI 47 | Bishop Daniel Obinim v. Commissioner-General, Ghana Revenue Authority; Ecobank Ghana Ltd (High Court) | |
| 2020 | Judicial review | High Court | Akua Sarpomaa Amoah | Bishop Daniel Obinim vs GRA & Fidelity Bank | Whether the plaintiff’s suit concerned a “tax decision” within the meaning of Act 915, thereby triggering the mandatory objection and appeal process | Yes | Ss41-44 of Act 915 | Bishop Daniel Obinim v. Commissioner-General, Ghana Revenue Authority; Fidelity Bank Ltd (High Court) | |
| 2020 | Judicial review | High Court | Akua Sarpomaa Amoah | Bishop Daniel Obinim vs GRA & Fidelity Bank | Whether the plaintiff properly invoked the High Court’s jurisdiction by writ without first lodging an objection with the Commissioner‑General and, if necessary, proceeding by the statutory appeal mechanism. | No | Ss41-44 of Act 915 | Bishop Daniel Obinim v. Commissioner-General, Ghana Revenue Authority; Fidelity Bank Ltd (High Court) | |
| 2020 | Judicial review | High Court | Akua Sarpomaa Amoah | Bishop Daniel Obinim vs GRA & Fidelity Bank | Whether the garnishment notice was unlawful for want of prior or contemporaneous service on the taxpayer. | No | S60 of Act 915 | Bishop Daniel Obinim v. Commissioner-General, Ghana Revenue Authority; Fidelity Bank Ltd (High Court) | |
| 2020 | Judicial review | High Court | Akua Sarpomaa Amoah | Bishop Daniel Obinim vs GRA & Fidelity Bank | If framed as supervisory relief, whether the action was properly commenced by writ rather than by judicial review under Order 55. | No | Order 55 | Bishop Daniel Obinim v. Commissioner-General, Ghana Revenue Authority; Fidelity Bank Ltd (High Court) | |
| 2024 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Eric Kyei Baffour, Novisi Aryene, and Stephen Oppong | Blue Sky Products (Ghana) Limited vs CG | Whether a Free Zone Enterprise engaged in the export of non-traditional goods is taxable at the 15% rate under paragraph 4 of the First Schedule of Act 896 after its initial ten-year tax holiday | Yes | | Blue Sky Products (Ghana) Ltd. v Commissioner-General | |
| 2024 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Eric Kyei Baffour, Novisi Aryene, and Stephen Oppong | Blue Sky Products (Ghana) Limited vs CG | Whether paragraph 4 of the First Schedule of Act 896 is inconsistent with section 28(2) of the Free Zones Act | No | | Blue Sky Products (Ghana) Ltd. v Commissioner-General | |
| 2024 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Eric Kyei Baffour, Novisi Aryene, and Stephen Oppong | Blue Sky Products (Ghana) Limited vs CG | Whether the application of the 15% rate constitutes a breach of the principle of tax avoidance or the right against discrimination under Article 17 of the 1992 Constitution | No | | Blue Sky Products (Ghana) Ltd. v Commissioner-General | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Constant K. Hometowu | Bumi Armada v CG | Whether Bumi satisfied the requirement to pay ¼ payment required by High Court Rules. | Yes | | Bumi Armada Ghana Ltd v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Constant K. Hometowu | Bumi Armada v CG | Whether Bumi was required to withhold tax on payments to the sub-subcontractors. | No | | Bumi Armada Ghana Ltd v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Constant K. Hometowu | Bumi Armada v CG | Whether GRA can rely on TB instead of financial statements for WHT assessment. | No | | Bumi Armada Ghana Ltd v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2025 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | G. S. SUURBAAREH, NOVISI A. ARYENE, DR. E. 0 . DAPAA | Bumi Armada v CG | Whether Bumi Armada was liable to withhold tax on payments made to its subcontractors in connection with its contract to supply Eni with patrol vessels | No | | Bumi Armada v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2025 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | G. S. SUURBAAREH, NOVISI A. ARYENE, DR. E. 0 . DAPAA | Bumi Armada v CG | Whether amendments to the Petroleum Income Tax Act, Internal Revenue Act, and the introduction of the Income Tax Act 2015 and related regulations had retrospective effect on contracts entered into before their enactmen | No | | Bumi Armada v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2025 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | G. S. SUURBAAREH, NOVISI A. ARYENE, DR. E. 0 . DAPAA | Bumi Armada v CG | Whether Bumi Armada was liable to withhold Pay As You Earn (PAYE) tax in respect of its contracts | No | | Bumi Armada v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2025 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | G. S. SUURBAAREH, NOVISI A. ARYENE, DR. E. 0 . DAPAA | Bumi Armada v CG | Whether it was proper for the High Court to order for the appointment of an independent auditor to reconcile the accounts after judgment | No | | Bumi Armada v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2025 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | G. S. SUURBAAREH, NOVISI A. ARYENE, DR. E. 0 . DAPAA | Bumi Armada v CG | Whether the tax assessment could be based on trial balance figures where no evidence is led to show errors | Yes | | Bumi Armada v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2019 | Article 2(1) action | Supreme Court | Adinyira, Dotse, Yeboah, Baffoe-Bonnie, Benin, Pwamang, Amegatcher | Centre for Juvenile Deliquency v CG & AG | Whether the requirement in Act 915 for TIN to be used before accessing the court system is unconstitutional | Yes | | Center for Juvenile Delinquency v GRA & Attorney-General | |
| 2009 | Appeal against CA decision | Supreme Court | Atugaba, Akuffo, Date-Bah, Owusu, Baffoe-Bonnie | Chapel Hill School v IRS | Whether a school operating as a company limited by gurantee met the requirements for income tax exemption as a school of public character | Yes | | Chapel Hill School Ltd v. Attorney General & Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service (Supreme Court) | |
| 2017 | Judicial review | High Court | Jennifer Dodoo | Clement Apaak v CG | Whether importers are entitled to input VAT deduction on goods purchased before VFRS was introduced | Yes | | Hon. Clement Apaak v. Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court) | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Jane Harriet Akweley Quaye | Coca-Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v CG | Whether the GRA erred in imposing withholding tax on purchase of trademark by treating it as a royalty | No | | Coca‑Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v Commissioner of IRS (Supreme Court) | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Jane Harriet Akweley Quaye | Coca-Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v CG | Whether the GRA erred by imposing withholding tax on transactions reversed by Coca-Cola | No | | Coca‑Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v Commissioner of IRS (Supreme Court) | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Jane Harriet Akweley Quaye | Coca-Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v CG | Whether the GRA erred by imposing withholding tax on payments to an employment agency | Yes | | Coca‑Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v Commissioner of IRS (Supreme Court) | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Jane Harriet Akweley Quaye | Coca-Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v CG | Whether the GRA erred in applying 10% WHT for commission to sales agent on trade discount for 2017 | Yes | | Coca‑Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v Commissioner of IRS (Supreme Court) | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Jane Harriet Akweley Quaye | Coca-Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v CG | Whether the GRA erred in imposing WHT on trade discount on the same amount accrued from 2017 in 2018 | No | | Coca‑Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v Commissioner of IRS (Supreme Court) | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Jane Harriet Akweley Quaye | Coca-Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v CG | Whether the GRA erred by imposing VAT on a service consumed outside Ghana | Yes | | Coca‑Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v Commissioner of IRS (Supreme Court) | |
| 2019 | Judicial review | High Court | Akua Sarpomaa Amoah | DM Kojo Trading Ent Ltd v CG | Whether a garnishee order on a bank is valid when the taxpayer was not formally served a notice of assessment | No | s60 of A915 | DM Kojo Trading Ent Ltd v. The Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2018 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Jerome Noble.Nkrumah | Eaton Towers v CG | Whether discriminatory pricing for different customers ia tax avoidance scheme | Yes | s99 of A915, s34 of A896 | Eaton Towers Ghana Ltd v. The Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2022 | Article 2(1) action | Supreme Court | Dotse, Amegatcher, Owusu, Lovelace-Johnson, Honyenuga, Prof. Mensa-Bonsu, Kulendi | Export Finance Company v CG | Whether Section 42(5)(a) (requiring full payment of disputed import duties) and Section 42(5)(b) (requiring 30% payment of other disputed taxes) are inconsistent with the right to a fair hearing and access to justice under Articles 19(13) and 140 | No | | Export Finance Company Ltd v. Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-General (Supreme Court) | |
| 2022 | Article 2(1) action | Supreme Court | Dotse, Amegatcher, Owusu, Lovelace-Johnson, Honyenuga, Prof. Mensa-Bonsu, Kulendi | Export Finance Company v CG | Whether these provisions are discriminatory under Article 17 | No | | Export Finance Company Ltd v. Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-General (Supreme Court) | |
| 2022 | Article 2(1) action | Supreme Court | Dotse, Amegatcher, Owusu, Lovelace-Johnson, Honyenuga, Prof. Mensa-Bonsu, Kulendi | Export Finance Company v CG | Whether Order 54 Rule 4 of C.I. 47, which requires proof of such payments before a tax appeal can be filed in the High Court, is unconstitutional | No | | Export Finance Company Ltd v. Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-General (Supreme Court) | |
| 2020 | Judicial review | High Court | George Koomson | Republic v. GRA (Ex parte Export Finance Co. Ltd & UMB) | Whether the Applicant satisfied the statutory requirement of paying 30% of the disputed tax to validate their objection | No | | Republic v. Ghana Revenue Authority, Ex parte Export Finance Company Ltd (High Court) | |
| 2020 | Judicial review | High Court | George Koomson | Republic v. GRA (Ex parte Export Finance Co. Ltd & UMB) | Whether the Commissioner-General’s failure to make a decision within the statutory 60-day period renders a subsequent decision void or implies acceptance of the objection | No | | Republic v. Ghana Revenue Authority, Ex parte Export Finance Company Ltd (High Court) | |
| 2020 | Judicial review | High Court | George Koomson | Republic v. GRA (Ex parte Export Finance Co. Ltd & UMB) | Whether the appropriate remedy was judicial review | No | | Republic v. Ghana Revenue Authority, Ex parte Export Finance Company Ltd (High Court) | |
| 2022 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Henry Kwofie, George Koomson, Richard Adjei-Frimpong | Fan Milk v CG | Whether the payments made by Fan Milk were discounts | No | | Fan Milk Limited v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2019 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Angelina Mensah-Homiah | Fan Milk v CG | Whether payment of 30% under Section 42(5) satisfies Order 54 Rule 4 requirement of 25% | Yes | | Fan Milk Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2019 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Angelina Mensah-Homiah | Fan Milk v CG | Whether the GRA was wrong to consider the relationship between the appellant and its customers as that of an agency relationship | No | | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2019 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Angelina Mensah-Homiah | Fan Milk v CG | Whether the GRA erred in reclassifying “discounts” as “commissions.” | No | | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2019 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Angelina Mensah-Homiah | Fan Milk v CG | Whether GRA erred in imposing withholding tax liability of GH₵7,655,676.22 based on the re-characterisation | No | | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2019 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Angelina Mensah-Homiah | Fan Milk v CG | Whether GRA erred in ignoring its own practice of treating discounts as exempt from tax as confirmed by Practice Notes issued 6th October 2016 | No | | Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2019 | Interlocutory injunction | High Court | George Koomson | Ivy Morrison v GRA | Whether the balance of convenience favoured the granting of an injunction against a statutory body performing its revenue mobilisation functions | No | | Ivy Morrison v Ghana Revenue Authority | |
| 2019 | Interlocutory injunction | High Court | George Koomson | Ivy Morrison v GRA | Whether an injunction should be granted for a policy (Benchmark Values) that was no longer being implemented | No | | Ivy Morrison v Ghana Revenue Authority | |
| 2020 | Enforcement of human rights | High Court | Frederick Tetteh | Kwasi Afrifa v GRA | Whether Applicant ought to have sought leave before filing further affidavit in support | Yes | | Kwasi Afrifa v. Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court) | |
| 2020 | Enforcement of human rights | High Court | Frederick Tetteh | Kwasi Afrifa v GRA | Whether the High Court should refer the alleged unconstitutionality of the payment requirement in Act 915 to the Supreme Court | No | | Kwasi Afrifa v. Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court) | |
| 2020 | Enforcement of human rights | High Court | Frederick Tetteh | Kwasi Afrifa v GRA | Whether instant procedure (human rights enforcement) adopted by Applicant is appropriate | No | | Kwasi Afrifa v. Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court) | |
| 2020 | Enforcement of human rights | High Court | Frederick Tetteh | Kwasi Afrifa v GRA | Whether Applicant entitled to order of mandamus for issuance of Tax Clearance Certificate after payment of GH₵85,264.68 | No | | Kwasi Afrifa v. Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court) | |
| 2022 | Reference from Court of Appeal | Supreme Court | Dotse, Pwamang, Kotey, Lovelace-Johnson, Torkornoo, Mensa-Bonsu, Kulendi | Kwasi Afrifa v CG | Whether upon a true and proper interpretation of Article 23 of the 1992 Constitution, section 42 (5) of the Revenue Administration Act, 2016 Act 915 is inconsistent with and violative of the constitutional right to administrative justice guaranteed under the provisions of Article 23 of the 1992 Constitution | No | | Kwasi Afrifa v. Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-General (SC Reference) | |
| 2022 | Article 2(1) action | Supreme Court | Dotse, Pwamang, Kotey, Lovelace-Johnson, Torkornoo, Mensa-Bonsu, Kulendi | Kwasi Afrifa v Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-General | Whether the Plaintiff properly invoked the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Articles 2(1) and 130(1)(a) of the 1992 Constitution. | No | | Kwasi Afrifa v Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-General (SC writ) | |
| 2022 | Article 2(1) action | Supreme Court | Dotse, Pwamang, Kotey, Lovelace-Johnson, Torkornoo, Mensa-Bonsu, Kulendi | Kwasi Afrifa v Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-General | Whether specific sections of the Revenue Administration Act, 2016 (Act 915) (including s. 42, 52-54, 56-67, 72-93) are inconsistent with the 1992 Constitution and therefore void | No | | Kwasi Afrifa v Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-General (SC writ) | |
| 2019 | Judicial review | High Court | Samuel Asiedu | Kwasi Nyantakyi Owiredu v CG | Whether an individual is entitled to mortgage interest deduction on monthly basis | Yes | | Kwasi Nyantakyi Owiredu v. Commissioner-General, Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court) | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Akua Sarpomaa Amoah | Maersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CG | Whether Articles 12 and 26 of the PA and PNDCL 188 exempt the Maersk from CIT after the deduction of the 5% final withholding tax | Yes | | | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Akua Sarpomaa Amoah | Maersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CG | Whether Articles 12 and 26 of the PA and PNDCL 188 exempt the Maersk from Branch profit Tax after the deduction of the 5% final withholding tax | Yes | | | |
| 2023 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Poku Acheampong, Bartels-Kodwo, and Noble-Nkrumah | Maersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CG | Whether the Appellant’s income earned from its activities in Ghana is exempt from taxation under the terms of the OCTP Petroleum Agreement | No | | Maersk Drillship IV Singapore Ltd v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2023 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Poku Acheampong, Bartels-Kodwo, and Noble-Nkrumah | Maersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CG | Whether the Appellant, as a non-resident entity with a PE in Ghana, is subject to tax on repatriated profits under Section 60 of the Income Tax Act, 2015 (Act 896). | Yes | | Maersk Drillship IV Singapore Ltd v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2023 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Poku Acheampong, Bartels-Kodwo, and Noble-Nkrumah | Maersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CG | Whether the application of Act 896 violated the “Stability Clause” in the Petroleum Agreement which protects contractors/subcontractors from adverse changes in law | No | | Maersk Drillship IV Singapore Ltd v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2023 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Poku Acheampong, Bartels-Kodwo, and Noble-Nkrumah | Maersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CG | Whether the Respondent could retrospectively apply new tax obligations to a subcontractor whose fiscal regime was supposedly “locked in” by PNDCL 188 | | | Maersk Drillship IV Singapore Ltd v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2025 | Appeal against Court of Appeal judgment | Supreme Court | Torkornoo, Amadu, Asiedu, Gaewu, Darko Asare | Maersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CG | Whether fiscal stability clause in petroleum agreement protects subcontractor from taxes beyond 5% withholding tax | Yes | | | |
| 2025 | Appeal against Court of Appeal judgment | Supreme Court | Torkornoo, Amadu, Asiedu, Gaewu, Darko Asare | Maersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CG | Whether Income Tax Act 2015 (Act 896) and Internal Revenue Act 2000 (Act 592) apply to petroleum operations covered by stability clause | No | | | |
| 2025 | Appeal against Court of Appeal judgment | Supreme Court | Torkornoo, Amadu, Asiedu, Gaewu, Darko Asare | Maersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CG | Whether branch profit tax applicable to Appellant’s income from petroleum operations | No | | | |
| | High Court | | Movelle Company Ltd v CG | | | | | |
| | Court of Appeal | | Movelle Company Ltd v CG | | | | | |
| 2011 | Appeal against Court of Appeal ruling | Supreme Court | Wood, Dotse, Yeboah, Gbadegbe, Akoto-Bamfo | Multichoice Ghana LTD v Commissioner | Whether SMCD 5 required interest income to be taxed separately from business income | No | SMCD 5 | Multichoice Ghana Limited v Commissioner of IRS (Supreme Court) | |
| 2026 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Mensah-Datsa (Mrs.),(Presiding); Ahmed (Mrs), Armah-Tetteh
| Orica Ghana Limited v CG | Whether the High Court erred in accepting photocopied VRPOs as authentic despite them being photocopies rather than originals. | No | | Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2026 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Mensah-Datsa (Mrs.),(Presiding); Ahmed (Mrs), Armah-Tetteh
| Orica Ghana Limited v CG | Whether the High Court erred in holding that GRA wrongly apportioned Orica’s business income into manufacturing and management service activities. | No | | Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2026 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Mensah-Datsa (Mrs.),(Presiding); Ahmed (Mrs), Armah-Tetteh
| Orica Ghana Limited v CG | Whether the judgment was against the weight of evidence. | No | | Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Jane Harriet Akweley Quaye | Orica Ghana Limited v CG | Whether GRA’s separation of Orica’s income into two to deny one part of the reduced CIT rate is an abuse of discretionary power and is unlawful | Yes | | Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Jane Harriet Akweley Quaye | Orica Ghana Limited v CG | Whether GRA’s refusal to consider VAT credit accrued prior to 2013 due to 3-year limitation in Act 546 is unlawful | Yes | | Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Jane Harriet Akweley Quaye | Orica Ghana Limited v CG | Whether GRA’s treatment of forfeiture of CIT overpayment because Orica did not apply for refund within the specified time is unlawful.
| Yes | | Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Jane Harriet Akweley Quaye | Orica Ghana Limited v CG | Whether GRA’s rejection of photocopies of VRPOs is unlawful | Yes | | Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| | High Court | Justin Kofi Dorgu | Perseus Mining Ghana Ltd | | | | | |
| 2023 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Senyo Dzamefe, P. Bright Mensah, Bartels-Kodwo | Perseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CG | Whether the High Court erred by failing to resolve primary facts before applying the law | Yes | | Perseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2023 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Senyo Dzamefe, P. Bright Mensah, Bartels-Kodwo | Perseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CG | Whether forward sales contracts with Franco Nevada Corporation were related-party transactions | No | | Perseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2023 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Senyo Dzamefe, P. Bright Mensah, Bartels-Kodwo | Perseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CG | Whether losses from forward sales contracts were deductible from business income | Yes | | Perseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2023 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Senyo Dzamefe, P. Bright Mensah, Bartels-Kodwo | Perseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CG | Whether the burden of proof under Section 92(1) of Act 915 was correctly applied | No | | Perseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2023 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Senyo Dzamefe, P. Bright Mensah, Bartels-Kodwo | Perseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CG | Whether GRA’s discretionary re-characterisation of transactions complied with Article 296(c) of the Constitution | No | | Perseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2025 | Appeal against Court of Appeal judgment | Supreme Court | Torkornoo, Baffoe-Bonnie, Mensa-Bonsu, Asiedu, Adjei-Frimpong | Perseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CG | Whether the GRA (Appellant/Applicant) was required to obtain special leave from the Supreme Court before filing its appeal | Yes | | Perseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Supreme Court) | |
| 2025 | Appeal against Court of Appeal judgment | Supreme Court | Torkornoo, Baffoe-Bonnie, Mensa-Bonsu, Asiedu, Adjei-Frimpong | Perseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CG | Whether a Notice of Appeal filed without the requisite statutory or constitutional leave is valid | No | | Perseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2025 | Appeal against Court of Appeal judgment | Supreme Court | Torkornoo, Baffoe-Bonnie, Mensa-Bonsu, Asiedu, Adjei-Frimpong | Perseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CG | Whether the Supreme Court can entertain motions (such as rectification of records) based on a void Notice of Appeal | No | | Perseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal) | |
| 2018 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Jennifer Abena Dadzie | QG Ghana Hotel Holding Limited v CG | Whether by subletting residential premsies, the appellant qualifed as an estate developer that has made a taxable supply of immovable property and should have charged VAT | Yes | s3(2) of A870 (repealed) | | |
| 2021 | Judicial review | High Court | Comfort Kasiwor Tasiame | Republic v CG Ex Parte Cereal Investment Company | Whether or not the GRA can enforce an objection decision when ITAB has not been set up to enable the taxpayer appeal the objection decision | No | | | |
| 2020 | Judicial review | High Court | George Koomson | Republic v CG Ex Parte: Export Finance Company, Interested party: Universal Merchant Bank | Whether the taxpayer can elect to treat the silence as allowing the objection as stated in the wrong version of the law | No | Section 43 of A915 | | |
| 2021 | Judicial review | High Court | RUBY ARYEETEY | Republic v CG, Ex parte: Agility Distribution Parks Ghana Ltd | Whether a VAT registered taxpayer is entitled to refund of input VAT due to passage of Act 915 | No | s50(1)(a) of A870, s68(1) of A915 | The Republic v. The Commissioner-General of the Ghana Revenue Authority; Ex Parte Agility Distribution Parks Ghana Ltd (High Court) | |
| 2022 | Certiorari to quash High Court ruling | Supreme Court | Pwamang, Dordzie, Torkonoo, Honyenuga, Kulendi | Republic v High Court Ex Parte: Afia African Village Limited, Interested party: CG | Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to entertain an application for mandamus where the Applicant had not exhausted the statutory dispute resolution procedures under the Revenue Administration Act, 2016 (Act 915) | No | ss41-44, 69 of Act 915, Or 54 of CI 47 | THE REPUBLIC v COMMISSIONER-GENERAL; EX PARTE AFIA AFRICAN VILLAGE LIMITED | |
| 2022 | Certiorari to quash High Court ruling | Supreme Court | Pwamang, Dordzie, Torkonoo, Honyenuga, Kulendi | Republic v High Court, Ex Parte: Afia African Village Ltd, Interested Party: CG | Whether the Interested Party had a statutory duty under Section 69 of Act 915 to refund the amount withheld as tax | No | | THE REPUBLIC v COMMISSIONER-GENERAL; EX PARTE AFIA AFRICAN VILLAGE LIMITED | |
| 2022 | Certiorari to quash High Court ruling | Supreme Court | Pwamang, Dordzie, Torkonoo, Honyenuga, Kulendi | Republic v High Court, Ex Parte: Afia African Village Ltd, Interested Party: CG | Whether the High Court erred in law on the face of the record in dismissing the application for mandamus | No | | THE REPUBLIC v COMMISSIONER-GENERAL; EX PARTE AFIA AFRICAN VILLAGE LIMITED | |
| 2022 | Certiorari to quash High Court ruling | Supreme Court | Pwamang, Dordzie, Torkonoo, Honyenuga, Kulendi | Republic v High Court, Ex Parte: Afia African Village Ltd, Interested Party: CG | Whether the Supreme Court should exercise its supervisory jurisdiction to quash the High Court’s ruling | No | | THE REPUBLIC v COMMISSIONER-GENERAL; EX PARTE AFIA AFRICAN VILLAGE LIMITED | |
| 2022 | Article 2(1) action | Supreme Court | Dotse, Pwamang, Amegatcher, Kotey, Owusu, Lovelace-Johnson, Mensa-Bonsu | Richard Amo-Hene v CG | Whether Section 42(5)(b) of the Revenue Administration Act, 2016 (Act 915) is inconsistent with the spirit and letter of Articles 2(1), 17(1), 125(2), 19(2)(c), 33(1), 132, 133(1), and 140 of the 1992 Constitution and to the extent of the inconsistency void | No | | | |
| 2022 | Article 2(1) action | Supreme Court | Dotse, Pwamang, Amegatcher, Kotey, Owusu, Lovelace-Johnson, Mensa-Bonsu | Richard Amo-Hene v CG | Whether Order 54 rule 4(1) of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2004 (C.I. 47) is inconsistent with the spirit and letter of Articles 2(1), 17(1), 125(2), 19(2)(c), 33(1), 33(5), 130(1), 132, 133(1), and 140 of the 1992 Constitution and impedes a person’s right of access to court, participation in the administration of justice, and the presumption of innocence, and to the extent of the inconsistency void | No | | | |
| 2013 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | John Ajet-Nasam | Scancom & ors v CG | Whether telcos are liable to pay communication service tax on interconnect charges | No | Act 754 | | |
| 2022 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Justin Kofi Dorgu | Seadrill v CG | Whether the appeal against the objection decision was filed late | Yes | | | |
| 2023 | Appeal against High Court judgment | Court of Appeal | Cecilia Hanzzy Sowah, Cyra Pamela C.A. Koranteng, Christopher Archer | Seadrill v CG | Whether an adjusted objection decision qualifies as a new tax decision under Section 42(9) of Act 915 | No | | | |
| 2017 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Jennifer Dodoo | Taylor & Taylor v CG | Whether or not GRA has no restriction on number of years to audit under the IRA | No | | | |
| 2017 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Jennifer Dodoo | Taylor & Taylor v CG | Whether the CG erred when he applied penalty of 30% for the late filing of returns by the Appellant from 2011 to 2013 | Yes | | | |
| 2023 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Afi Agbanu Kudomor | Scancom PLC v CG | Whether apportionment between exempt and taxable supplies based on respective contribution to total revenue for VAT-associated levies on imported servcies is justified | Yes | | Scancom PLC v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2023 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | Afi Agbanu Kudomor | Scancom PLC v CG | Whether VAT-associated levies are due even if the foreign services are used for taxable supplies | Yes | | Scancom PLC v Commissioner-General (High Court) | |
| 2024 | Appeal against objection decision | High Court | EMMANUEL ATSU LODOH | Scancom PLC v CG | Whether or not a local telco is required to withhold tax when paying non-resident person for interconnect services | No | Section 105(h) of Act 896 | | |