YearProcedureCourtCoramTitleIssuesHoldingRelevant lawLink to case briefLink to full judgment
2018Judicial reviewHigh CourtEmmanuel AnkamahACS Africa Coastal Services Ltd v CGWhether, on a proper interpretation of Act 862 (as amended), the plaintiff is subject to the NFSLUnansweredAct 862ACS Africa Coastal Services (GH) Ltd v Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court)
2018Judicial reviewHigh CourtEmmanuel AnkamahACS Africa Coastal Services Ltd v CGWhether the High Court had jurisdiction to hear the case instituted as a writ instead of an appealNos44 of A915, Order 2R2 of CI 47ACS Africa Coastal Services (GH) Ltd v Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court)
2021Judicial reviewHigh CourtSheila MintaAfrican Mining Services (Ghana) Pty Ltd v CGWhether it was lawful for the taxpayer to split an assessment into interpretation issues and computational issues and apply for waiver of the 30% requirement on the computational issuesNos42(5-6) of A915African Mining Services (Ghana) Pty Ltd v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2018Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtSamuel AsieduBeiersdorf Ghana Limited v CGWhether payments made under an unregistered technology transfer agreement are tax deductibleNoAct 865: ss 32(c), 37, 41(2)(c), 43, Act 896: ss 9(1), 116–117Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2018Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtSamuel AsieduBeiersdorf Ghana Limited v CGWhether reimbursements to distributors for 3rd party costs iro putting up stands should attract withholding taxesYesAct 896): ss 9(1), 116–117Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2018Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtSamuel AsieduBeiersdorf Ghana Limited v CGWhether reimbursements to distributors iro discounts to distributors’ customers can be reclassified as commission to sales agentYesBeiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2018Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtSamuel AsieduBeiersdorf Ghana Limited v CGWhether the 1/4 payment requirement in CI47 must be met in addition t the 30% requirement under A915YesOrder 54 r 4(1)–(2)Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2019Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealDennis Adjei, Henry Kwofie, Alex Poku-AcheampongBeiersdorf Ghana Limited v CGWhether the 1/4 payment requirement in CI47 must be met in addition t the 30% requirement under A915NoBeiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2019Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealDennis Adjei, Henry Kwofie, Alex Poku-AcheampongBeiersdorf Ghana Limited v CGWhether payments made under an unregistered technology transfer agreement are tax deductibleYesBeiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2020Judicial reviewHigh CourtDoreen G. Boakye-AgyeiBishop Daniel Obinim vs GRA & Ecobank Ghana LtdWhether a taxpayer’s response to a demand notice 6 months after being served with a notice of assessment constitutes an objectionNoAct 915, Orders 54 & 55 of CI 47Bishop Daniel Obinim v. Commissioner-General, Ghana Revenue Authority; Ecobank Ghana Ltd (High Court)
2020Judicial reviewHigh CourtDoreen G. Boakye-AgyeiBishop Daniel Obinim vs GRA & Ecobank Ghana LtdWhether there was a breach of natural justice when the GRA did not respond to the taxpayer’s response to the demand noticeNoAct 915, Orders 54 & 55 of CI 47Bishop Daniel Obinim v. Commissioner-General, Ghana Revenue Authority; Ecobank Ghana Ltd (High Court)
2020Judicial reviewHigh CourtAkua Sarpomaa AmoahBishop Daniel Obinim vs GRA & Fidelity BankWhether the plaintiff’s suit concerned a “tax decision” within the meaning of Act 915, thereby triggering the mandatory objection and appeal processYesSs41-44 of Act 915Bishop Daniel Obinim v. Commissioner-General, Ghana Revenue Authority; Fidelity Bank Ltd (High Court)
2020Judicial reviewHigh CourtAkua Sarpomaa AmoahBishop Daniel Obinim vs GRA & Fidelity BankWhether the plaintiff properly invoked the High Court’s jurisdiction by writ without first lodging an objection with the Commissioner‑General and, if necessary, proceeding by the statutory appeal mechanism.NoSs41-44 of Act 915Bishop Daniel Obinim v. Commissioner-General, Ghana Revenue Authority; Fidelity Bank Ltd (High Court)
2020Judicial reviewHigh CourtAkua Sarpomaa AmoahBishop Daniel Obinim vs GRA & Fidelity BankWhether the garnishment notice was unlawful for want of prior or contemporaneous service on the taxpayer.NoS60 of Act 915Bishop Daniel Obinim v. Commissioner-General, Ghana Revenue Authority; Fidelity Bank Ltd (High Court)
2020Judicial reviewHigh CourtAkua Sarpomaa AmoahBishop Daniel Obinim vs GRA & Fidelity BankIf framed as supervisory relief, whether the action was properly commenced by writ rather than by judicial review under Order 55.NoOrder 55Bishop Daniel Obinim v. Commissioner-General, Ghana Revenue Authority; Fidelity Bank Ltd (High Court)
2024Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealEric Kyei Baffour, Novisi Aryene, and Stephen OppongBlue Sky Products (Ghana) Limited vs CGWhether a Free Zone Enterprise engaged in the export of non-traditional goods is taxable at the 15% rate under paragraph 4 of the First Schedule of Act 896 after its initial ten-year tax holidayYesBlue Sky Products (Ghana) Ltd. v Commissioner-General
2024Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealEric Kyei Baffour, Novisi Aryene, and Stephen OppongBlue Sky Products (Ghana) Limited vs CGWhether paragraph 4 of the First Schedule of Act 896 is inconsistent with section 28(2) of the Free Zones ActNoBlue Sky Products (Ghana) Ltd. v Commissioner-General
2024Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealEric Kyei Baffour, Novisi Aryene, and Stephen OppongBlue Sky Products (Ghana) Limited vs CGWhether the application of the 15% rate constitutes a breach of the principle of tax avoidance or the right against discrimination under Article 17 of the 1992 ConstitutionNoBlue Sky Products (Ghana) Ltd. v Commissioner-General
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtConstant K. HometowuBumi Armada v CGWhether Bumi satisfied the requirement to pay ¼ payment required by High Court Rules.YesBumi Armada Ghana Ltd v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtConstant K. HometowuBumi Armada v CGWhether Bumi was required to withhold tax on payments to the sub-subcontractors.NoBumi Armada Ghana Ltd v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtConstant K. HometowuBumi Armada v CGWhether GRA can rely on TB instead of financial statements for WHT assessment.NoBumi Armada Ghana Ltd v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2025Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealG. S. SUURBAAREH, NOVISI A. ARYENE, DR. E. 0 . DAPAABumi Armada v CGWhether Bumi Armada was liable to withhold tax on payments made to its subcontractors in connection with its contract to supply Eni with patrol vesselsNoBumi Armada v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2025Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealG. S. SUURBAAREH, NOVISI A. ARYENE, DR. E. 0 . DAPAABumi Armada v CGWhether amendments to the Petroleum Income Tax Act, Internal Revenue Act, and the introduction of the Income Tax Act 2015 and related regulations had retrospective effect on contracts entered into before their enactmenNoBumi Armada v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2025Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealG. S. SUURBAAREH, NOVISI A. ARYENE, DR. E. 0 . DAPAABumi Armada v CGWhether Bumi Armada was liable to withhold Pay As You Earn (PAYE) tax in respect of its contractsNoBumi Armada v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2025Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealG. S. SUURBAAREH, NOVISI A. ARYENE, DR. E. 0 . DAPAABumi Armada v CGWhether it was proper for the High Court to order for the appointment of an independent auditor to reconcile the accounts after judgmentNoBumi Armada v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2025Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealG. S. SUURBAAREH, NOVISI A. ARYENE, DR. E. 0 . DAPAABumi Armada v CGWhether the tax assessment could be based on trial balance figures where no evidence is led to show errorsYesBumi Armada v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2019Article 2(1) actionSupreme CourtAdinyira, Dotse, Yeboah, Baffoe-Bonnie, Benin, Pwamang, AmegatcherCentre for Juvenile Deliquency v CG & AGWhether the requirement in Act 915 for TIN to be used before accessing the court system is unconstitutionalYesCenter for Juvenile Delinquency v GRA & Attorney-General
2009Appeal against CA decisionSupreme CourtAtugaba, Akuffo, Date-Bah, Owusu, Baffoe-BonnieChapel Hill School v IRSWhether a school operating as a company limited by gurantee met the requirements for income tax exemption as a school of public characterYesChapel Hill School Ltd v. Attorney General & Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service (Supreme Court)
2017Judicial reviewHigh CourtJennifer DodooClement Apaak v CGWhether importers are entitled to input VAT deduction on goods purchased before VFRS was introducedYesHon. Clement Apaak v. Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court)
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJane Harriet Akweley QuayeCoca-Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v CGWhether the GRA erred in imposing withholding tax on purchase of trademark by treating it as a royaltyNoCoca‑Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v Commissioner of IRS (Supreme Court)
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJane Harriet Akweley QuayeCoca-Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v CGWhether the GRA erred by imposing withholding tax on transactions reversed by Coca-ColaNoCoca‑Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v Commissioner of IRS (Supreme Court)
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJane Harriet Akweley QuayeCoca-Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v CGWhether the GRA erred by imposing withholding tax on payments to an employment agencyYesCoca‑Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v Commissioner of IRS (Supreme Court)
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJane Harriet Akweley QuayeCoca-Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v CGWhether the GRA erred in applying 10% WHT for commission to sales agent on trade discount for 2017YesCoca‑Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v Commissioner of IRS (Supreme Court)
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJane Harriet Akweley QuayeCoca-Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v CGWhether the GRA erred in imposing WHT on trade discount on the same amount accrued from 2017 in 2018NoCoca‑Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v Commissioner of IRS (Supreme Court)
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJane Harriet Akweley QuayeCoca-Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v CGWhether the GRA erred by imposing VAT on a service consumed outside GhanaYesCoca‑Cola Equatorial Africa Limited v Commissioner of IRS (Supreme Court)
2019Judicial reviewHigh CourtAkua Sarpomaa AmoahDM Kojo Trading Ent Ltd v CGWhether a garnishee order on a bank is valid when the taxpayer was not formally served a notice of assessmentNos60 of A915DM Kojo Trading Ent Ltd v. The Commissioner-General (High Court)
2018Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJerome Noble.NkrumahEaton Towers v CGWhether discriminatory pricing for different customers ia tax avoidance schemeYess99 of A915, s34 of A896Eaton Towers Ghana Ltd v. The Commissioner-General (High Court)
2022Article 2(1) actionSupreme CourtDotse, Amegatcher, Owusu, Lovelace-Johnson, Honyenuga, Prof. Mensa-Bonsu, KulendiExport Finance Company v CGWhether Section 42(5)(a) (requiring full payment of disputed import duties) and Section 42(5)(b) (requiring 30% payment of other disputed taxes) are inconsistent with the right to a fair hearing and access to justice under Articles 19(13) and 140NoExport Finance Company Ltd v. Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-General (Supreme Court)
2022Article 2(1) actionSupreme CourtDotse, Amegatcher, Owusu, Lovelace-Johnson, Honyenuga, Prof. Mensa-Bonsu, KulendiExport Finance Company v CGWhether these provisions are discriminatory under Article 17NoExport Finance Company Ltd v. Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-General (Supreme Court)
2022Article 2(1) actionSupreme CourtDotse, Amegatcher, Owusu, Lovelace-Johnson, Honyenuga, Prof. Mensa-Bonsu, KulendiExport Finance Company v CGWhether Order 54 Rule 4 of C.I. 47, which requires proof of such payments before a tax appeal can be filed in the High Court, is unconstitutionalNoExport Finance Company Ltd v. Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-General (Supreme Court)
2020Judicial reviewHigh CourtGeorge KoomsonRepublic v. GRA (Ex parte Export Finance Co. Ltd & UMB)Whether the Applicant satisfied the statutory requirement of paying 30% of the disputed tax to validate their objectionNoRepublic v. Ghana Revenue Authority, Ex parte Export Finance Company Ltd (High Court)
2020Judicial reviewHigh CourtGeorge KoomsonRepublic v. GRA (Ex parte Export Finance Co. Ltd & UMB)Whether the Commissioner-General’s failure to make a decision within the statutory 60-day period renders a subsequent decision void or implies acceptance of the objectionNoRepublic v. Ghana Revenue Authority, Ex parte Export Finance Company Ltd (High Court)
2020Judicial reviewHigh CourtGeorge KoomsonRepublic v. GRA (Ex parte Export Finance Co. Ltd & UMB)Whether the appropriate remedy was judicial reviewNoRepublic v. Ghana Revenue Authority, Ex parte Export Finance Company Ltd (High Court)
2022Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealHenry Kwofie, George Koomson, Richard Adjei-FrimpongFan Milk v CGWhether the payments made by Fan Milk were discountsNoFan Milk Limited v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2019Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtAngelina Mensah-HomiahFan Milk v CGWhether payment of 30% under Section 42(5) satisfies Order 54 Rule 4 requirement of 25%YesFan Milk Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2019Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtAngelina Mensah-HomiahFan Milk v CGWhether the GRA was wrong to consider the relationship between the appellant and its customers as that of an agency relationshipNoBeiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2019Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtAngelina Mensah-HomiahFan Milk v CGWhether the GRA erred in reclassifying “discounts” as “commissions.”NoBeiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2019Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtAngelina Mensah-HomiahFan Milk v CGWhether GRA erred in imposing withholding tax liability of GH₵7,655,676.22 based on the re-characterisationNoBeiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2019Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtAngelina Mensah-HomiahFan Milk v CGWhether GRA erred in ignoring its own practice of treating discounts as exempt from tax as confirmed by Practice Notes issued 6th October 2016NoBeiersdorf Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2019Interlocutory injunctionHigh CourtGeorge KoomsonIvy Morrison v GRAWhether the balance of convenience favoured the granting of an injunction against a statutory body performing its revenue mobilisation functionsNoIvy Morrison v Ghana Revenue Authority
2019Interlocutory injunctionHigh CourtGeorge KoomsonIvy Morrison v GRAWhether an injunction should be granted for a policy (Benchmark Values) that was no longer being implementedNoIvy Morrison v Ghana Revenue Authority
2020Enforcement of human rightsHigh CourtFrederick TettehKwasi Afrifa v GRAWhether Applicant ought to have sought leave before filing further affidavit in supportYesKwasi Afrifa v. Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court)
2020Enforcement of human rightsHigh CourtFrederick TettehKwasi Afrifa v GRAWhether the High Court should refer the alleged unconstitutionality of the payment requirement in Act 915 to the Supreme CourtNoKwasi Afrifa v. Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court)
2020Enforcement of human rightsHigh CourtFrederick TettehKwasi Afrifa v GRAWhether instant procedure (human rights enforcement) adopted by Applicant is appropriateNoKwasi Afrifa v. Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court)
2020Enforcement of human rightsHigh CourtFrederick TettehKwasi Afrifa v GRAWhether Applicant entitled to order of mandamus for issuance of Tax Clearance Certificate after payment of GH₵85,264.68NoKwasi Afrifa v. Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court)
2022Reference from Court of AppealSupreme CourtDotse, Pwamang, Kotey, Lovelace-Johnson, Torkornoo, Mensa-Bonsu, KulendiKwasi Afrifa v CGWhether upon a true and proper interpretation of Article 23 of the 1992 Constitution, section 42 (5) of the Revenue Administration Act, 2016 Act 915 is inconsistent with and violative of the constitutional right to administrative justice guaranteed under the provisions of Article 23 of the 1992 ConstitutionNoKwasi Afrifa v. Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-General (SC Reference)
2022Article 2(1) actionSupreme CourtDotse, Pwamang, Kotey, Lovelace-Johnson, Torkornoo, Mensa-Bonsu, KulendiKwasi Afrifa v Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-GeneralWhether the Plaintiff properly invoked the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Articles 2(1) and 130(1)(a) of the 1992 Constitution.NoKwasi Afrifa v Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-General (SC writ)
2022Article 2(1) actionSupreme CourtDotse, Pwamang, Kotey, Lovelace-Johnson, Torkornoo, Mensa-Bonsu, KulendiKwasi Afrifa v Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-GeneralWhether specific sections of the Revenue Administration Act, 2016 (Act 915) (including s. 42, 52-54, 56-67, 72-93) are inconsistent with the 1992 Constitution and therefore voidNoKwasi Afrifa v Ghana Revenue Authority & Attorney-General (SC writ)
2019Judicial reviewHigh CourtSamuel AsieduKwasi Nyantakyi Owiredu v CGWhether an individual is entitled to mortgage interest deduction on monthly basisYesKwasi Nyantakyi Owiredu v. Commissioner-General, Ghana Revenue Authority (High Court)
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtAkua Sarpomaa AmoahMaersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CGWhether Articles 12 and 26 of the PA and PNDCL 188 exempt the Maersk from CIT after the deduction of the 5% final withholding taxYes
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtAkua Sarpomaa AmoahMaersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CGWhether Articles 12 and 26 of the PA and PNDCL 188 exempt the Maersk from Branch profit Tax after the deduction of the 5% final withholding taxYes
2023Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealPoku Acheampong, Bartels-Kodwo, and Noble-NkrumahMaersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CGWhether the Appellant’s income earned from its activities in Ghana is exempt from taxation under the terms of the OCTP Petroleum AgreementNoMaersk Drillship IV Singapore Ltd v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2023Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealPoku Acheampong, Bartels-Kodwo, and Noble-NkrumahMaersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CGWhether the Appellant, as a non-resident entity with a PE in Ghana, is subject to tax on repatriated profits under Section 60 of the Income Tax Act, 2015 (Act 896).YesMaersk Drillship IV Singapore Ltd v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2023Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealPoku Acheampong, Bartels-Kodwo, and Noble-NkrumahMaersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CGWhether the application of Act 896 violated the “Stability Clause” in the Petroleum Agreement which protects contractors/subcontractors from adverse changes in lawNoMaersk Drillship IV Singapore Ltd v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2023Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealPoku Acheampong, Bartels-Kodwo, and Noble-NkrumahMaersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CGWhether the Respondent could retrospectively apply new tax obligations to a subcontractor whose fiscal regime was supposedly “locked in” by PNDCL 188Maersk Drillship IV Singapore Ltd v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2025Appeal against Court of Appeal judgmentSupreme CourtTorkornoo, Amadu, Asiedu, Gaewu, Darko AsareMaersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CGWhether fiscal stability clause in petroleum agreement protects subcontractor from taxes beyond 5% withholding taxYes
2025Appeal against Court of Appeal judgmentSupreme CourtTorkornoo, Amadu, Asiedu, Gaewu, Darko AsareMaersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CGWhether Income Tax Act 2015 (Act 896) and Internal Revenue Act 2000 (Act 592) apply to petroleum operations covered by stability clauseNo
2025Appeal against Court of Appeal judgmentSupreme CourtTorkornoo, Amadu, Asiedu, Gaewu, Darko AsareMaersk Drillship IV Singapore PTE LTD v CGWhether branch profit tax applicable to Appellant’s income from petroleum operationsNo
High CourtMovelle Company Ltd v CG
Court of AppealMovelle Company Ltd v CG
2011Appeal against Court of Appeal rulingSupreme CourtWood, Dotse, Yeboah, Gbadegbe, Akoto-BamfoMultichoice Ghana LTD v CommissionerWhether SMCD 5 required interest income to be taxed separately from business incomeNoSMCD 5Multichoice Ghana Limited v Commissioner of IRS (Supreme Court)
2026Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealMensah-Datsa (Mrs.),(Presiding); Ahmed (Mrs), Armah-Tetteh
Orica Ghana Limited v CGWhether the High Court erred in accepting photocopied VRPOs as authentic despite them being photocopies rather than originals.NoOrica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2026Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealMensah-Datsa (Mrs.),(Presiding); Ahmed (Mrs), Armah-Tetteh
Orica Ghana Limited v CGWhether the High Court erred in holding that GRA wrongly apportioned Orica’s business income into manufacturing and management service activities.NoOrica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2026Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealMensah-Datsa (Mrs.),(Presiding); Ahmed (Mrs), Armah-Tetteh
Orica Ghana Limited v CGWhether the judgment was against the weight of evidence.NoOrica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJane Harriet Akweley QuayeOrica Ghana Limited v CGWhether GRA’s separation of Orica’s income into two to deny one part of the reduced CIT rate is an abuse of discretionary power and is unlawfulYesOrica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJane Harriet Akweley QuayeOrica Ghana Limited v CGWhether GRA’s refusal to consider VAT credit accrued prior to 2013 due to 3-year limitation in Act 546 is unlawfulYesOrica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJane Harriet Akweley QuayeOrica Ghana Limited v CGWhether GRA’s treatment of forfeiture of CIT overpayment because Orica did not apply for refund within the specified time is unlawful.
YesOrica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJane Harriet Akweley QuayeOrica Ghana Limited v CGWhether GRA’s rejection of photocopies of VRPOs is unlawfulYesOrica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)Orica Ghana Limited v Commissioner-General (High Court)
High CourtJustin Kofi DorguPerseus Mining Ghana Ltd
2023Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealSenyo Dzamefe, P. Bright Mensah, Bartels-KodwoPerseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CGWhether the High Court erred by failing to resolve primary facts before applying the lawYesPerseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2023Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealSenyo Dzamefe, P. Bright Mensah, Bartels-KodwoPerseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CGWhether forward sales contracts with Franco Nevada Corporation were related-party transactionsNoPerseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2023Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealSenyo Dzamefe, P. Bright Mensah, Bartels-KodwoPerseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CGWhether losses from forward sales contracts were deductible from business incomeYesPerseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2023Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealSenyo Dzamefe, P. Bright Mensah, Bartels-KodwoPerseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CGWhether the burden of proof under Section 92(1) of Act 915 was correctly appliedNoPerseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2023Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealSenyo Dzamefe, P. Bright Mensah, Bartels-KodwoPerseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CGWhether GRA’s discretionary re-characterisation of transactions complied with Article 296(c) of the ConstitutionNoPerseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2025Appeal against Court of Appeal judgmentSupreme CourtTorkornoo, Baffoe-Bonnie, Mensa-Bonsu, Asiedu, Adjei-FrimpongPerseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CGWhether the GRA (Appellant/Applicant) was required to obtain special leave from the Supreme Court before filing its appealYesPerseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Supreme Court)
2025Appeal against Court of Appeal judgmentSupreme CourtTorkornoo, Baffoe-Bonnie, Mensa-Bonsu, Asiedu, Adjei-FrimpongPerseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CGWhether a Notice of Appeal filed without the requisite statutory or constitutional leave is validNoPerseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2025Appeal against Court of Appeal judgmentSupreme CourtTorkornoo, Baffoe-Bonnie, Mensa-Bonsu, Asiedu, Adjei-FrimpongPerseus Mining Ghana Ltd v CGWhether the Supreme Court can entertain motions (such as rectification of records) based on a void Notice of AppealNoPerseus Mining Ghana Limited v. Commissioner-General (Court of Appeal)
2018Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJennifer Abena DadzieQG Ghana Hotel Holding Limited v CGWhether by subletting residential premsies, the appellant qualifed as an estate developer that has made a taxable supply of immovable property and should have charged VATYess3(2) of A870 (repealed)
2021Judicial reviewHigh CourtComfort Kasiwor TasiameRepublic v CG Ex Parte Cereal Investment CompanyWhether or not the GRA can enforce an objection decision when ITAB has not been set up to enable the taxpayer appeal the objection decisionNo
2020Judicial reviewHigh CourtGeorge KoomsonRepublic v CG Ex Parte: Export Finance Company, Interested party: Universal Merchant BankWhether the taxpayer can elect to treat the silence as allowing the objection as stated in the wrong version of the lawNoSection 43 of A915
2021Judicial reviewHigh CourtRUBY ARYEETEYRepublic v CG, Ex parte: Agility Distribution Parks Ghana LtdWhether a VAT registered taxpayer is entitled to refund of input VAT due to passage of Act 915Nos50(1)(a) of A870, s68(1) of A915The Republic v. The Commissioner-General of the Ghana Revenue Authority; Ex Parte Agility Distribution Parks Ghana Ltd (High Court)
2022Certiorari to quash High Court rulingSupreme CourtPwamang, Dordzie, Torkonoo, Honyenuga, KulendiRepublic v High Court Ex Parte: Afia African Village Limited, Interested party: CGWhether the High Court had jurisdiction to entertain an application for mandamus where the Applicant had not exhausted the statutory dispute resolution procedures under the Revenue Administration Act, 2016 (Act 915)Noss41-44, 69 of Act 915, Or 54 of CI 47THE REPUBLIC v COMMISSIONER-GENERAL; EX PARTE AFIA AFRICAN VILLAGE LIMITED
2022Certiorari to quash High Court rulingSupreme CourtPwamang, Dordzie, Torkonoo, Honyenuga, KulendiRepublic v High Court, Ex Parte: Afia African Village Ltd, Interested Party: CGWhether the Interested Party had a statutory duty under Section 69 of Act 915 to refund the amount withheld as taxNoTHE REPUBLIC v COMMISSIONER-GENERAL; EX PARTE AFIA AFRICAN VILLAGE LIMITED
2022Certiorari to quash High Court rulingSupreme CourtPwamang, Dordzie, Torkonoo, Honyenuga, KulendiRepublic v High Court, Ex Parte: Afia African Village Ltd, Interested Party: CGWhether the High Court erred in law on the face of the record in dismissing the application for mandamusNoTHE REPUBLIC v COMMISSIONER-GENERAL; EX PARTE AFIA AFRICAN VILLAGE LIMITED
2022Certiorari to quash High Court rulingSupreme CourtPwamang, Dordzie, Torkonoo, Honyenuga, KulendiRepublic v High Court, Ex Parte: Afia African Village Ltd, Interested Party: CGWhether the Supreme Court should exercise its supervisory jurisdiction to quash the High Court’s rulingNoTHE REPUBLIC v COMMISSIONER-GENERAL; EX PARTE AFIA AFRICAN VILLAGE LIMITED
2022Article 2(1) actionSupreme CourtDotse, Pwamang, Amegatcher, Kotey, Owusu, Lovelace-Johnson, Mensa-BonsuRichard Amo-Hene v CGWhether Section 42(5)(b) of the Revenue Administration Act, 2016 (Act 915) is inconsistent with the spirit and letter of Articles 2(1), 17(1), 125(2), 19(2)(c), 33(1), 132, 133(1), and 140 of the 1992 Constitution and to the extent of the inconsistency voidNo
2022Article 2(1) actionSupreme CourtDotse, Pwamang, Amegatcher, Kotey, Owusu, Lovelace-Johnson, Mensa-BonsuRichard Amo-Hene v CGWhether Order 54 rule 4(1) of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2004 (C.I. 47) is inconsistent with the spirit and letter of Articles 2(1), 17(1), 125(2), 19(2)(c), 33(1), 33(5), 130(1), 132, 133(1), and 140 of the 1992 Constitution and impedes a person’s right of access to court, participation in the administration of justice, and the presumption of innocence, and to the extent of the inconsistency voidNo
2013Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJohn Ajet-NasamScancom & ors v CGWhether telcos are liable to pay communication service tax on interconnect chargesNoAct 754
2022Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJustin Kofi DorguSeadrill v CGWhether the appeal against the objection decision was filed lateYes
2023Appeal against High Court judgmentCourt of AppealCecilia Hanzzy Sowah, Cyra Pamela C.A. Koranteng, Christopher ArcherSeadrill v CGWhether an adjusted objection decision qualifies as a new tax decision under Section 42(9) of Act 915No
2017Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJennifer DodooTaylor & Taylor v CGWhether or not GRA has no restriction on number of years to audit under the IRANo
2017Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtJennifer DodooTaylor & Taylor v CGWhether the CG erred when he applied penalty of 30% for the late filing of returns by the Appellant from 2011 to 2013Yes
2023Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtAfi Agbanu KudomorScancom PLC v CGWhether apportionment between exempt and taxable supplies based on respective contribution to total revenue for VAT-associated levies on imported servcies is justifiedYesScancom PLC v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2023Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtAfi Agbanu KudomorScancom PLC v CGWhether VAT-associated levies are due even if the foreign services are used for taxable suppliesYesScancom PLC v Commissioner-General (High Court)
2024Appeal against objection decisionHigh CourtEMMANUEL ATSU LODOHScancom PLC v CGWhether or not a local telco is required to withhold tax when paying non-resident person for interconnect servicesNoSection 105(h) of Act 896